Staphylococcus Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Staphylococcus, including details on mrsa, hospitals, infection, antibiotic resistance, superbugs. | ||||||||
|
Characterisation of receptor binding by the chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus and the effects of the host immune response.Wright AJ, Higginbottom A, Philippe D, Upadhyay A, Bagby S, Read RC, Monk PN, Partridge LJ Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK. The chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus (CHIPS) is reported to bind to the receptors for C5a and formylated peptides and has been proposed as a promising lead for the development of new anti-inflammatory compounds. Here we have examined the receptor specificity and mode of action of recombinant CHIPS(28-149) and also the immune response to CHIPS(28-149) in patients with S. aureus infections and in uninfected controls. Recombinant CHIPS(28-149) bound with high affinity to the human C5a receptor (C5aR), but had low affinity for the second C5a receptor, C5L2, and the formyl peptide receptor, FPR. Although ligand binding to C5aR was potently inhibited, CHIPS(28-149) had much weaker effects on ligand binding to C5L2 and FPR. Similarly, CHIPS(28-149) potently inhibited the ligand-induced activation of C5aR but was less potent at inhibition via FPR. NMR studies showed that CHIPS(28-149) bound directly to the N-terminus of C5aR but not C5L2, and CHIPS(28-149) residues involved in the interaction were identified by chemical shift analysis. All human sera examined contained high titres of IgG and IgA reactivity against CHIPS(28-149), and no correlation was observed between infection status at the time of serum collection and antibody titre. Individual serum samples promoted or inhibited the binding of CHIPS(28-149) to C5aR, or had no effect. IgG depletion of serum samples abrogated the effects on CHIPS binding, demonstrating that these were antibody mediated. Sera from infected individuals were more likely to inhibit CHIPS(28-149) binding than sera from healthy controls. However, high antibody titres correlated well with both inhibition and enhancement of CHIPS(28-149) binding to C5aR; this suggests that the inhibitory effect relates to epitope specificity rather than greater antibody binding. We conclude that CHIPS is likely to be too immunogenic to be used as an anti-inflammatory treatment but that some antibodies against CHIPS may be useful in the treatment of S. aureus infections. Published 19 February 2007 in Mol Immunol, 44(10): 2507-17.
© 2004-2008 Staphylococcus Research Today. All Rights Reserved. |
| ||||||
